Learn how Ethora and Tiledesk differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these chatbot platforms is best for you.
Both Ethora and Tiledesk have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Ethora significantly outpaces Tiledesk in community adoption with 541 stars compared to 12 stars on GitHub. This 45.1x difference suggests Ethora has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Ethora has 110 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ethora last updated 20 hours ago and Tiledesk 15 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Tiledesk leverages CSS, Bash, Typescript, SCSS.
Tiledesk has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Ethora which began 5 years ago. This 3.4-year head start suggests Tiledesk may have more mature features and established processes.
Tiledesk uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Ethora's Apache-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Chatbot Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ethora also focuses on Team Chat & Messaging while Tiledesk extends into Customer Communication Platforms, Live Chat & Messaging.
Tiledeskvs
BotpressActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.
