Learn how Discourse and Flarum differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these community building platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
14 yearsLicense
GPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
discourse/discourse
Last 30 days
Last commit
24 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
v2.0.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
flarum/flarum
Both Discourse and Flarum have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Discourse leads in popularity with 48,046 stars vs 16,441 stars for Flarum. The 192% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Discourse has 9,058 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Discourse and Flarum are moving at much the same rate, adding 114 stars and adding 30 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.2% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Discourse last updated 8 hours ago and Flarum 24 days ago.
Discourse uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, SCSS, Ruby while Flarum leverages PHP.
Discourse has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Flarum which began 12 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests Discourse may have more mature features and established processes.
Flarum uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Discourse's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Community Building Platforms, Forum Software.
Both Discourse and Flarum offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.