CrateDB vs Neon Postgres
Learn how CrateDB and Neon Postgres differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.
Learn how CrateDB and Neon Postgres differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these relational databases (sql) is best for you.
CrateDB
Stars
4,391Forks
596Last commit
14 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0
Auto-fetched .
Neon Postgres
Stars
22,020Forks
968Last commit
2 months agoRepository age
5 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Both CrateDB and Neon Postgres have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both CrateDB and Neon Postgres have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Neon Postgres significantly outpaces CrateDB in community adoption with 22,020 stars compared to 4,391 stars on GitHub. This 5.0x difference suggests Neon Postgres has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Neon Postgres has 968 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Development Activity
CrateDB shows more recent development activity with its last commit 14 hours ago, while Neon Postgres was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests CrateDB is being more actively maintained.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python, Java. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Neon Postgres leverages JavaScript, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, C#.
Project Maturity
CrateDB has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Neon Postgres which began 5 years ago. This 8.1-year head start suggests CrateDB may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Relational Databases (SQL). However, they also have distinct specializations: CrateDB also focuses on Time Series Databases, IoT Databases.
CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.