Learn how CoMaps and Organic Maps differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these maps & navigation is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Repository
comaps/comaps
Last 30 days
Last commit
21 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
2026.11.11-39License
Apache-2.0Repository
organicmaps
Both CoMaps and Organic Maps have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Organic Maps significantly outpaces CoMaps in community adoption with 15,956 stars compared to 2,241 stars on GitHub. This 7.1x difference suggests Organic Maps has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Organic Maps has 1,696 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CoMaps is growing faster, adding 78 stars in the last 30 days (+3.6%) against adding 282 stars for Organic Maps (+1.8%). CoMaps is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CoMaps last updated 16 hours ago and Organic Maps 21 hours ago.
Organic Maps has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to CoMaps which began 2 years ago. This 4.4-year head start suggests Organic Maps may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Maps & Navigation.