Learn how CoMaps and Organic Maps differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these maps & navigation is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both CoMaps and Organic Maps have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Organic Maps significantly outpaces CoMaps in community adoption with 15,182 stars compared to 2,003 stars on GitHub. This 7.6x difference suggests Organic Maps has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Organic Maps has 1,548 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CoMaps is growing faster, adding 90 stars in the last 30 days (+4.7%) against adding 336 stars for Organic Maps (+2.3%). CoMaps is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CoMaps last updated 9 hours ago and Organic Maps 9 hours ago.
Organic Maps has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to CoMaps which began 1 year ago. This 4.4-year head start suggests Organic Maps may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Maps & Navigation.