What is the main difference between CoMaps and Organic Maps?

CoMaps and Organic Maps are both maps & navigation but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: CoMaps or Organic Maps?

The choice between CoMaps and Organic Maps depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from CoMaps to Organic Maps?

Migration between CoMaps and Organic Maps is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Windshift – The self-hosted platform that replaces Jira.

Learn more

CoMaps vs Organic Maps

Learn how CoMaps and Organic Maps differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these maps & navigation is best for you.

CoMaps

Offline navigation app for hiking, biking, and driving. No tracking, no data collection, community-driven maps. Works without internet connection.

Visit CoMaps Read more

2,184stars+82(+3.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
comaps/comaps

Organic Maps

Free, open-source offline maps app with detailed trails, turn-by-turn navigation, and zero tracking. Perfect for hikers, cyclists, and travelers seeking privacy.

Visit Organic Maps Read more

15,745stars+266(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
8 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
2026.09.29-32
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
organicmaps

Detailed Comparison

Both CoMaps and Organic Maps have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Organic Maps wins

Community & Popularity

Organic Maps significantly outpaces CoMaps in community adoption with 15,745 stars compared to 2,184 stars on GitHub. This 7.2x difference suggests Organic Maps has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Organic Maps has 1,658 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

CoMaps wins

Growth Momentum

CoMaps is growing faster, adding 82 stars in the last 30 days (+3.9%) against adding 266 stars for Organic Maps (+1.7%). CoMaps is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with CoMaps last updated 10 hours ago and Organic Maps 8 hours ago.

Organic Maps wins

Project Maturity

Organic Maps has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to CoMaps which began 2 years ago. This 4.4-year head start suggests Organic Maps may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Maps & Navigation.

Other tool comparisons to consider