Learn how CoMaps and OSMAnd differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these maps & navigation is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Repository
comaps/comaps
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
16 yearsVersion
2.0.0Repository
osmandapp/osmand
Both CoMaps and OSMAnd have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OSMAnd leads in popularity with 6,105 stars vs 2,184 stars for CoMaps. The 180% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OSMAnd has 1,251 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CoMaps is growing faster, adding 82 stars in the last 30 days (+3.9%) against adding 71 stars for OSMAnd (+1.2%). CoMaps is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CoMaps last updated 10 hours ago and OSMAnd 8 hours ago.
OSMAnd has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to CoMaps which began 2 years ago. This 14.4-year head start suggests OSMAnd may have more mature features and established processes.
CoMaps is licensed under Apache-2.0, while OSMAnd's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Maps & Navigation.