Learn how CoMaps and OSMAnd differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these maps & navigation is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Both CoMaps and OSMAnd have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OSMAnd leads in popularity with 5,962 stars vs 2,047 stars for CoMaps. The 191% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OSMAnd has 1,221 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
CoMaps is growing faster, adding 90 stars in the last 30 days (+4.6%) against adding 72 stars for OSMAnd (+1.2%). CoMaps is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CoMaps last updated 12 hours ago and OSMAnd 7 hours ago.
OSMAnd has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to CoMaps which began 1 year ago. This 14.4-year head start suggests OSMAnd may have more mature features and established processes.
CoMaps is licensed under Apache-2.0, while OSMAnd's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Maps & Navigation.