Learn how Cloud in a Bottle and YunoHost differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these home server platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
6 monthsVersion
v0.2.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
cloud-in-a-bottle
Last 30 days
Last commit
19 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
12.1.41.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
yunohost/yunohost
Both Cloud in a Bottle and YunoHost have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
YunoHost leads in popularity with 2,987 stars vs 1,237 stars for Cloud in a Bottle. The 141% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, YunoHost has 352 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Cloud in a Bottle is growing faster, adding 38 stars in the last 30 days (+3.2%) against adding 8 stars for YunoHost (+0.3%). Cloud in a Bottle is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cloud in a Bottle last updated 12 hours ago and YunoHost 19 hours ago.
YunoHost has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Cloud in a Bottle which began 6 months ago. This 12.1-year head start suggests YunoHost may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Home Server Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: YunoHost extends into Control Panels.
Both Cloud in a Bottle and YunoHost offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.