Learn how Akaunting and Flowglad differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these accounting software is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
3.3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
akaunting/akaunting
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 months agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v0.18.0Repository
flowglad/flowglad
Akaunting appears to have several advantages over Flowglad, particularly in popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity and features when making your decision.
Akaunting significantly outpaces Flowglad in community adoption with 10,235 stars compared to 1,722 stars on GitHub. This 5.9x difference suggests Akaunting has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Akaunting has 3,006 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Akaunting is growing faster, adding 87 stars in the last 30 days (+0.9%) against adding 0 stars for Flowglad (0%). Akaunting is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Akaunting shows more recent development activity with its last commit 16 hours ago, while Flowglad was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Akaunting is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Akaunting uses SCSS, PHP, Vue, Laravel while Flowglad leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
Akaunting has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Flowglad which began 2 years ago. This 7.8-year head start suggests Akaunting may have more mature features and established processes.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Accounting Software. However, they also have distinct specializations: Akaunting also focuses on Invoicing & Payments, Expense Management.
Akaunting provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Flowglad may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.