Learn how Akaunting and Crater differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these invoicing & payment tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 2 years and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Akaunting appears to have several advantages over Crater, particularly in activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Akaunting having 9,781 stars and Crater having 8,284 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Akaunting has 2,899 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Akaunting shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 days ago, while Crater was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Akaunting is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, SCSS, PHP, Vue, Laravel. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Akaunting uses CSS while Crater leverages Bash, Typescript.
Akaunting has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Crater which began 6 years ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests Akaunting may have more mature features and established processes.
Crater is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Akaunting's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Invoicing & Payments, Accounting Software. However, they also have distinct specializations: Akaunting also focuses on Expense Management while Crater extends into Fintech Infrastructure.
Akaunting provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Crater may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.