Crater vs Invoice Ninja
Learn how Crater and Invoice Ninja differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these invoicing & payment tools is best for you.
Learn how Crater and Invoice Ninja differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these invoicing & payment tools is best for you.
Crater
Stars
8,285Forks
1,683Last commit
2 years agoRepository age
6 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 2 years and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .
Invoice Ninja
Stars
9,707Forks
2,624Last commit
17 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsSelf-hosted
Yes
Auto-fetched .
Detailed Comparison
Invoice Ninja appears to have several advantages over Crater, particularly in activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Invoice Ninja appears to have several advantages over Crater, particularly in activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Crater having 8,285 stars and Invoice Ninja having 9,707 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Invoice Ninja has 2,624 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Development Activity
Invoice Ninja shows more recent development activity with its last commit 17 hours ago, while Crater was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests Invoice Ninja is being more actively maintained.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, SCSS, PHP, Laravel. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Crater uses Bash, Vue while Invoice Ninja leverages CSS.
Project Maturity
Invoice Ninja has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Crater which began 6 years ago. This 6.1-year head start suggests Invoice Ninja may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Crater is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Invoice Ninja's license terms are not publicly specified.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Invoicing & Payments. However, they also have distinct specializations: Crater also focuses on Accounting Software, Fintech Infrastructure while Invoice Ninja extends into Expense Management, Freelancer Tools.
Hosting & Deployment
Invoice Ninja provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Crater may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Efficient App – Not all Open Source alternatives are equal — Narrow down the best, without the bullsh*t.