Learn how Actual and Budget Board differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these budgeting apps is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v26.10.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
actualbudget/actual
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.8.2License
AGPL-3.0Repository
teelur/budget-board
Actual appears to have several advantages over Budget Board, particularly in popularity, growth, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Actual significantly outpaces Budget Board in community adoption with 29,762 stars compared to 890 stars on GitHub. This 33.4x difference suggests Actual has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Actual has 3,204 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Actual is growing faster, adding 600 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 6 stars for Budget Board (+0.7%). Actual is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Actual last updated 16 hours ago and Budget Board 16 hours ago.
Budget Board has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Actual which began 4 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Budget Board may have more mature features and established processes.
Actual uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Budget Board's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Budgeting Apps.
Actual provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Budget Board may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.