Learn how Warp and WaveTerm differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai terminals is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Warp and WaveTerm have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Warp leads in popularity with 64,352 stars vs 22,065 stars for WaveTerm. The 192% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Warp has 5,445 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Warp and WaveTerm are moving at much the same rate, adding 885 stars and adding 336 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.4% vs +1.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Warp last updated 6 hours ago and WaveTerm 8 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Warp uses Python, C, Rust, Objective-C, MATLAB while WaveTerm leverages CSS, JSX, SCSS, Golang.
Both projects started around the same time, with Warp beginning 5 years ago and WaveTerm 4 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Warp is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while WaveTerm uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Terminals.