Learn how Structr and WebStudio differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 days agoRepository age
16 yearsSelf-hosted
YesRepository
structr/structr
Last 30 days

Both Structr and WebStudio have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
WebStudio significantly outpaces Structr in community adoption with 9,103 stars compared to 828 stars on GitHub. This 11.0x difference suggests WebStudio has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, WebStudio has 1,630 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
WebStudio is growing faster, adding 123 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against losing 2 stars for Structr (-0.2%). WebStudio is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Structr last updated 12 days ago and WebStudio 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Structr uses Java while WebStudio leverages JSX, Remix.
Structr has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to WebStudio which began 5 years ago. This 11.3-year head start suggests Structr may have more mature features and established processes.
WebStudio is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Structr's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: WebStudio extends into Website Builders, Frontend Development.
Structr provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while WebStudio may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.