Learn how Structr and Vvveb CMS differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 days agoRepository age
16 yearsSelf-hosted
YesRepository
structr/structr
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 days agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
1.0.8.6License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
givanz/vvveb
Both Structr and Vvveb CMS have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Structr having 828 stars and Vvveb CMS having 1,212 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Vvveb CMS has 219 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Vvveb CMS is growing faster, adding 14 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against losing 2 stars for Structr (-0.2%). Vvveb CMS is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Structr last updated 16 days ago and Vvveb CMS 10 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Structr uses JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Java while Vvveb CMS leverages PHP.
Structr has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Vvveb CMS which began 8 years ago. This 7.4-year head start suggests Structr may have more mature features and established processes.
Vvveb CMS is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Structr's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Vvveb CMS extends into Website Builders, Traditional & Flat-File CMS.
Both Structr and Vvveb CMS offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.