What is the main difference between Structr and Teable?

Structr and Teable are both low-code/no-code platforms but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Structr or Teable?

The choice between Structr and Teable depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Structr to Teable?

Migration between Structr and Teable is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.

Learn more

Structr vs Teable

Learn how Structr and Teable differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.

Structr

Open-source low-code platform combining Neo4j graph database, visual schema editor, automatic REST APIs, and page rendering in one self-hosted environment.

Visit Structr Read more

828stars-2(-0.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
16 days ago
Repository age
16 years
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
structr/structr

Teable

Open-source platform combining powerful database capabilities with a user-friendly spreadsheet interface for efficient data management and collaboration.

Visit Teable Read more

21,933stars+98(+0.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
18 hours ago
Repository age
4 years
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
teableio/teable

Detailed Comparison

Teable appears to have several advantages over Structr, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Teable wins

Community & Popularity

Teable significantly outpaces Structr in community adoption with 21,933 stars compared to 828 stars on GitHub. This 26.5x difference suggests Teable has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Teable has 1,357 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Teable wins

Growth Momentum

Teable is growing faster, adding 98 stars in the last 30 days (+0.4%) against losing 2 stars for Structr (-0.2%). Teable is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Structr last updated 16 days ago and Teable 18 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Structr uses Java while Teable leverages JSX, Next.js, NestJS.

Structr wins

Project Maturity

Structr has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Teable which began 4 years ago. This 11.9-year head start suggests Structr may have more mature features and established processes.

Teable wins

Licensing

Teable is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Structr's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Teable extends into Collaborative Workspaces.

Comparable