Learn how Roundcube and Thunderbird differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email clients is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
1.7.5License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
roundcubemail
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
1 yearLicense
MPL-2.0Repository
thunderbird-desktop
Roundcube appears to have several advantages over Thunderbird, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Roundcube significantly outpaces Thunderbird in community adoption with 7,242 stars compared to 216 stars on GitHub. This 33.5x difference suggests Roundcube has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Roundcube has 1,803 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Thunderbird is growing faster, adding 50 stars in the last 30 days (+30%) against adding 16 stars for Roundcube (+0.2%). Thunderbird is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Roundcube last updated 1 day ago and Thunderbird 1 day ago.
Roundcube has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Thunderbird which began 1 year ago. This 13.7-year head start suggests Roundcube may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Roundcube is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Thunderbird uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Clients.
Roundcube provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Thunderbird may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.