Learn how Plasmic and TipTap differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these frontend development tools is best for you.
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Both Plasmic and TipTap have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
TipTap significantly outpaces Plasmic in community adoption with 37,610 stars compared to 6,912 stars on GitHub. This 5.4x difference suggests TipTap has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, TipTap has 3,049 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Plasmic last updated 9 hours ago and TipTap 11 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plasmic uses Bash, Python, Next.js, C, Objective-C, C++, Tanstack Start while TipTap leverages Vue.
TipTap has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Plasmic which began 5 years ago. This 2.5-year head start suggests TipTap may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Frontend Development. However, they also have distinct specializations: Plasmic also focuses on Low-Code/No-Code, UI/UX Design.
Plasmic provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while TipTap may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.