Learn how MaxKB and Onyx differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these enterprise knowledge search is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Onyx appears to have several advantages over MaxKB, particularly in growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with MaxKB having 22,980 stars and Onyx having 32,494 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Onyx has 4,563 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Onyx is growing faster, adding 386 stars in the last 30 days (+1.2%) against adding 182 stars for MaxKB (+0.8%). Onyx is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with MaxKB last updated 10 hours ago and Onyx 3 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: MaxKB uses SCSS, C, Vue, Django while Onyx leverages CSS, JSX, Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with MaxKB beginning 3 years ago and Onyx 3 years ago.
Onyx uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than MaxKB's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Enterprise Knowledge Search.
Both MaxKB and Onyx offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.