Learn how FastGPT and MaxKB differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these enterprise knowledge search is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v4.17.4Repository
labring/fastgpt
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v2.10.8-ltsLicense
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
1panel-dev/maxkb
MaxKB appears to have several advantages over FastGPT, particularly in licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with FastGPT having 29,999 stars and MaxKB having 23,117 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, FastGPT has 7,369 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
FastGPT and MaxKB are moving at much the same rate, adding 212 stars and adding 190 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.7% vs +0.8%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with FastGPT last updated 10 hours ago and MaxKB 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: FastGPT uses CSS, JSX, Next.js, NestJS while MaxKB leverages C, Vue, Django.
Both projects started around the same time, with FastGPT beginning 4 years ago and MaxKB 3 years ago.
MaxKB is licensed under GPL-3.0, while FastGPT's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Enterprise Knowledge Search.
MaxKB provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while FastGPT may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.