Learn how LocalSend and PairDrop differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these cloud file sync & share tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

LocalSend appears to have several advantages over PairDrop, particularly in popularity, growth and activity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
LocalSend significantly outpaces PairDrop in community adoption with 88,731 stars compared to 11,199 stars on GitHub. This 7.9x difference suggests LocalSend has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, LocalSend has 4,933 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
LocalSend is growing faster, adding 3,106 stars in the last 30 days (+3.6%) against adding 208 stars for PairDrop (+1.9%). LocalSend is both larger and pulling further ahead.
LocalSend shows more recent development activity with its last commit 22 hours ago, while PairDrop was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests LocalSend is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: LocalSend uses C, Rust, Objective-C, Swift, C++, Kotlin, Dart.
Both projects started around the same time, with LocalSend beginning 4 years ago and PairDrop 4 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: LocalSend is licensed under Apache-2.0 while PairDrop uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Cloud File Sync & Share.