Learn how Krakend and Tyk differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api infrastructure tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 days agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
v3.0.3License
Apache-2.0Repository
krakend/krakend-ce
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
13 yearsVersion
v5.16.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
tyktechnologies/tyk
Both Krakend and Tyk have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tyk significantly outpaces Krakend in community adoption with 10,879 stars compared to 2,702 stars on GitHub. This 4.0x difference suggests Tyk has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Tyk has 1,170 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Krakend is growing faster, adding 14 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against adding 24 stars for Tyk (+0.2%). Krakend is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Krakend last updated 6 days ago and Tyk 2 days ago.
Tyk has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Krakend which began 9 years ago. This 3.6-year head start suggests Tyk may have more mature features and established processes.
Krakend is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Tyk's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Infrastructure. However, they also have distinct specializations: Krakend also focuses on API Integration.
Tyk provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Krakend may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.