Learn how Krakend and Tyk differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api infrastructure tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Krakend and Tyk have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tyk significantly outpaces Krakend in community adoption with 10,819 stars compared to 2,676 stars on GitHub. This 4.0x difference suggests Tyk has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Tyk has 1,167 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Krakend is growing faster, adding 15 stars in the last 30 days (+0.6%) against adding 30 stars for Tyk (+0.3%). Krakend is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Krakend last updated 18 hours ago and Tyk 16 hours ago.
Tyk has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Krakend which began 9 years ago. This 3.6-year head start suggests Tyk may have more mature features and established processes.
Krakend is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Tyk's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Infrastructure. However, they also have distinct specializations: Krakend also focuses on API Integration.
Tyk provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Krakend may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.