Learn how Fusio and Krakend differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api infrastructure tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v7.2.1License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
apioo/fusio
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
9 yearsVersion
v3.0.2License
Apache-2.0Repository
krakend/krakend-ce
Fusio appears to have several advantages over Krakend, particularly in maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Fusio having 2,127 stars and Krakend having 2,697 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Krakend has 502 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Fusio and Krakend are moving at much the same rate, adding 10 stars and adding 9 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fusio last updated 5 days ago and Krakend 5 days ago.
Fusio uses PHP while Krakend leverages Bash, Golang.
Fusio has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Krakend which began 9 years ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests Fusio may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Infrastructure. However, they also have distinct specializations: Krakend extends into API Integration.
Fusio provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Krakend may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.