Learn how Fusio and Krakend differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api infrastructure tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Both Fusio and Krakend have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Fusio having 2,116 stars and Krakend having 2,683 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Krakend has 501 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Krakend is growing faster, adding 18 stars in the last 30 days (+0.7%) against adding 3 stars for Fusio (+0.1%). Krakend is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fusio last updated 10 days ago and Krakend 2 days ago.
Fusio uses PHP while Krakend leverages Bash, Golang.
Fusio has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Krakend which began 9 years ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests Fusio may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Infrastructure. However, they also have distinct specializations: Krakend extends into API Integration.
Fusio provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Krakend may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.