Learn how Apache APISIX and Fusio differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api infrastructure tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
3.19.0License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
apache/apisix
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v7.2.1License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
apioo/fusio
Both Apache APISIX and Fusio have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Apache APISIX significantly outpaces Fusio in community adoption with 17,251 stars compared to 2,127 stars on GitHub. This 8.1x difference suggests Apache APISIX has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Apache APISIX has 2,979 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Apache APISIX and Fusio are moving at much the same rate, adding 83 stars and adding 10 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.5% vs +0.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Apache APISIX last updated 5 hours ago and Fusio 5 days ago.
Apache APISIX uses Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang, Java, Perl, Lua while Fusio leverages PHP.
Fusio has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Apache APISIX which began 8 years ago. This 3.8-year head start suggests Fusio may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Infrastructure.
Both Apache APISIX and Fusio offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.