Learn how Apache APISIX and Fusio differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api infrastructure tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Apache APISIX and Fusio have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Apache APISIX significantly outpaces Fusio in community adoption with 17,125 stars compared to 2,116 stars on GitHub. This 8.1x difference suggests Apache APISIX has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Apache APISIX has 2,946 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Apache APISIX is growing faster, adding 128 stars in the last 30 days (+0.8%) against adding 3 stars for Fusio (+0.1%). Apache APISIX is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Apache APISIX last updated 19 hours ago and Fusio 10 days ago.
Apache APISIX uses Bash, Typescript, Python, Golang, Java, Perl, Lua while Fusio leverages PHP.
Fusio has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Apache APISIX which began 7 years ago. This 3.8-year head start suggests Fusio may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Infrastructure.
Both Apache APISIX and Fusio offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.