Learn how Fusio and Gravitee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these api infrastructure tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
11 yearsVersion
v7.2.1License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
apioo/fusio
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
11 yearsLicense
Apache-2.0Repository
gravitee-api-management
Both Fusio and Gravitee have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Fusio significantly outpaces Gravitee in community adoption with 2,127 stars compared to 462 stars on GitHub. This 4.6x difference suggests Fusio has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fusio has 246 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Gravitee is growing faster, adding 6 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against adding 10 stars for Fusio (+0.5%). Gravitee is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fusio last updated 5 days ago and Gravitee 5 hours ago.
Fusio uses PHP while Gravitee leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS, Java, Lua, ASP.NET.
Both projects started around the same time, with Fusio beginning 11 years ago and Gravitee 11 years ago.
Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in API Infrastructure.
Fusio provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Gravitee may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.