Karakeep vs Wallabag
Learn how Karakeep and Wallabag differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bookmark managers is best for you.
Learn how Karakeep and Wallabag differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these bookmark managers is best for you.
Karakeep
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v0.33.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
karakeep-app/karakeep
Wallabag
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 days agoRepository age
13 yearsVersion
2.6.14License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
wallabag/wallabag
Detailed Comparison
Both Karakeep and Wallabag have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Karakeep and Wallabag have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Karakeep leads in popularity with 28,819 stars vs 12,954 stars for Wallabag. The 122% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Karakeep has 1,485 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Karakeep is growing faster, adding 693 stars in the last 30 days (+2.5%) against adding 73 stars for Wallabag (+0.6%). Karakeep is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Karakeep last updated 5 days ago and Wallabag 3 days ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Karakeep uses CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Wallabag leverages SCSS, PHP.
Project Maturity
Wallabag has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Karakeep which began 3 years ago. This 11.0-year head start suggests Wallabag may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Wallabag uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Karakeep's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Bookmark Managers, Read-it-Later & Knowledge Hubs.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Karakeep and Wallabag offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.