Learn how Fumadocs and Scalar differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these technical writing platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Fumadocs and Scalar have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Fumadocs having 13,099 stars and Scalar having 16,082 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Scalar has 934 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Fumadocs is growing faster, adding 258 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 207 stars for Scalar (+1.3%). Fumadocs is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fumadocs last updated 23 hours ago and Scalar 15 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Python, Next.js, Golang. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Fumadocs uses Tanstack Start while Scalar leverages Vue, C#, SvelteKit, NestJS, Nuxt.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Fumadocs beginning 3 years ago and Scalar 3 years ago.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Technical Writing Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Scalar extends into API Documentation Generators, API Development & Testing.
Scalar provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fumadocs may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.