Learn how Formbricks and Formizee differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these form builder tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 9 months and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Formbricks appears to have several advantages over Formizee, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Formbricks significantly outpaces Formizee in community adoption with 12,067 stars compared to 179 stars on GitHub. This 67.4x difference suggests Formbricks has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Formbricks has 2,198 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Formbricks shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 hours ago, while Formizee was last updated 9 months ago. This suggests Formbricks is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Formbricks uses Bash, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin.
Formbricks has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Formizee which began 2 years ago. This 1.9-year head start suggests Formbricks may have more mature features and established processes.
Formizee is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Formbricks's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Form Builders. However, they also have distinct specializations: Formbricks also focuses on Feedback & Feature Request Management, Survey Tools.
Formbricks provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Formizee may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.