Learn how FeedLog and Fider differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these feedback & feature request management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
5 days agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v0.38.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
getfider/fider
Both FeedLog and Fider have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Fider significantly outpaces FeedLog in community adoption with 4,589 stars compared to 189 stars on GitHub. This 24.3x difference suggests Fider has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fider has 871 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
FeedLog is growing faster, adding 24 stars in the last 30 days (+15%) against adding 45 stars for Fider (+1%). FeedLog is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with FeedLog last updated 13 hours ago and Fider 5 days ago.
Fider has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to FeedLog which began 6 months ago. This 9.4-year head start suggests Fider may have more mature features and established processes.
FeedLog uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Fider's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Feedback & Feature Request Management.
Both FeedLog and Fider offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.