Learn how DoubleZero and Postal differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these email platforms is best for you.
Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 1 year and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Postal appears to have several advantages over DoubleZero, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Postal significantly outpaces DoubleZero in community adoption with 16,460 stars compared to 1,242 stars on GitHub. This 13.3x difference suggests Postal has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Postal has 1,229 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Postal shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 days ago, while DoubleZero was last updated 1 year ago. This suggests Postal is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: DoubleZero uses CSS, Typescript, Elixir while Postal leverages SCSS, Ruby, CoffeeScript.
Postal has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to DoubleZero which began 2 years ago. This 7.1-year head start suggests Postal may have more mature features and established processes.
Postal uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than DoubleZero's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Email Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Postal extends into Email Marketing & Newsletters.
Both DoubleZero and Postal offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.