Learn how Dittofeed and Novu differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these customer communication platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Dittofeed and Novu have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Novu significantly outpaces Dittofeed in community adoption with 40,168 stars compared to 3,011 stars on GitHub. This 13.3x difference suggests Novu has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Novu has 4,513 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Dittofeed is growing faster, adding 59 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against adding 152 stars for Novu (+0.4%). Dittofeed is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Dittofeed last updated 7 days ago and Novu 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Novu leverages Python, Golang, SvelteKit, Perl, NestJS.
Novu has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Dittofeed which began 4 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Novu may have more mature features and established processes.
Dittofeed is licensed under MIT, while Novu's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Customer Communication Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Dittofeed also focuses on Marketing Automation while Novu extends into Push Notification.
Both Dittofeed and Novu offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.