Learn how CodeEdit and Zed differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these general purpose editors is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
22 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v0.3.6License
MITRepository
codeeditapp/codeedit
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v1.27.0License
GPL-3.0Repository
zed-industries/zed
Zed appears to have several advantages over CodeEdit, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zed significantly outpaces CodeEdit in community adoption with 94,374 stars compared to 23,102 stars on GitHub. This 4.1x difference suggests Zed has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zed has 11,558 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zed is growing faster, adding 2,875 stars in the last 30 days (+3.1%) against adding 38 stars for CodeEdit (+0.2%). Zed is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with CodeEdit last updated 22 days ago and Zed 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, C, Objective-C. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: CodeEdit uses Swift, Ruby while Zed leverages JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Python, Rust.
Zed has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to CodeEdit which began 5 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Zed may have more mature features and established processes.
CodeEdit uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Zed's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in General Purpose Editors. However, they also have distinct specializations: Zed extends into AI-Powered Editors.