Learn how Athas and Zed differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these general purpose editors is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Zed appears to have several advantages over Athas, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zed significantly outpaces Athas in community adoption with 90,984 stars compared to 3,087 stars on GitHub. This 29.5x difference suggests Zed has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zed has 10,799 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zed is growing faster, adding 1,566 stars in the last 30 days (+1.8%) against adding 27 stars for Athas (+0.9%). Zed is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Athas last updated 22 hours ago and Zed 10 hours ago.
Zed has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Athas which began 1 year ago. This 4.4-year head start suggests Zed may have more mature features and established processes.
Zed is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Athas's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in General Purpose Editors, AI-Powered Editors.