Learn how Athas and Zed differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these general purpose editors is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v0.17.0License
AGPL-3.0Repository
athasdev/athas
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v1.27.0License
GPL-3.0Repository
zed-industries/zed
Zed appears to have several advantages over Athas, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Zed significantly outpaces Athas in community adoption with 94,374 stars compared to 3,121 stars on GitHub. This 30.2x difference suggests Zed has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Zed has 11,558 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Zed is growing faster, adding 2,875 stars in the last 30 days (+3.1%) against adding 24 stars for Athas (+0.8%). Zed is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Athas last updated 2 days ago and Zed 10 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Rust. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Athas uses JSX, Tauri while Zed leverages Python, C, Objective-C.
Zed has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Athas which began 1 year ago. This 4.4-year head start suggests Zed may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Athas is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Zed uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in General Purpose Editors, AI-Powered Editors.