Learn how Bluesky and Hey differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these decentralized social networks is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Repository

Both Bluesky and Hey have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hey leads in popularity with 29,366 stars vs 18,298 stars for Bluesky. The 60% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Bluesky has 2,835 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Bluesky is growing faster, adding 64 stars in the last 30 days (+0.4%) against losing 17 stars for Hey (-0.1%). Bluesky is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Bluesky last updated 1 day ago and Hey 14 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Bluesky uses Bash, Golang, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin.
Both projects started around the same time, with Bluesky beginning 4 years ago and Hey 5 years ago.
Bluesky uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Hey's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Decentralized Social Networks. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hey extends into Web3 Platforms.