Learn how Affine and Dim0 differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these whiteboarding tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
23 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.27.4License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
toeverything/affine
Last 30 days

Both Affine and Dim0 have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Affine significantly outpaces Dim0 in community adoption with 73,850 stars compared to 187 stars on GitHub. This 394.9x difference suggests Affine has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Affine has 5,393 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Dim0 is growing faster, adding 32 stars in the last 30 days (+21%) against adding 853 stars for Affine (+1.2%). Dim0 is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Affine last updated 23 hours ago and Dim0 3 days ago.
Affine has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Dim0 which began 7 months ago. This 3.7-year head start suggests Affine may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Whiteboarding. However, they also have distinct specializations: Affine also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Collaborative Notes & Wikis.
Both Affine and Dim0 offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.