Learn how Dim0 and Tldraw differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these whiteboarding tools is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
24 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v5.5.2Repository
tldraw/tldraw
Both Dim0 and Tldraw have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Tldraw significantly outpaces Dim0 in community adoption with 51,090 stars compared to 187 stars on GitHub. This 273.2x difference suggests Tldraw has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Tldraw has 3,576 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Dim0 is growing faster, adding 32 stars in the last 30 days (+21%) against adding 506 stars for Tldraw (+1%). Dim0 is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Dim0 last updated 3 days ago and Tldraw 24 hours ago.
Tldraw has been in development longer, starting 5 years ago, compared to Dim0 which began 7 months ago. This 4.9-year head start suggests Tldraw may have more mature features and established processes.
Dim0 is licensed under MIT, while Tldraw's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Whiteboarding. However, they also have distinct specializations: Tldraw extends into Collaborative Workspaces, Online Design.
Dim0 provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Tldraw may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.