What is the main difference between ActivePieces and Structr?

ActivePieces and Structr are both low-code/no-code platforms but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: ActivePieces or Structr?

The choice between ActivePieces and Structr depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from ActivePieces to Structr?

Migration between ActivePieces and Structr is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Bright Data – Web data for AI agents and apps. Built-in unblocking, proxies, and ready-made APIs.

Learn more

ActivePieces vs Structr

Learn how ActivePieces and Structr differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.

ActivePieces

Open-source integration platform for seamless workflow automation. Connect apps, automate tasks, and boost productivity effortlessly.

Visit ActivePieces Read more

25,246stars+493(+2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
4 years
Version
0.92.3
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
activepieces

Structr

Open-source low-code platform combining Neo4j graph database, visual schema editor, automatic REST APIs, and page rendering in one self-hosted environment.

Visit Structr Read more

828stars-2(-0.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
16 days ago
Repository age
16 years
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
structr/structr

Detailed Comparison

ActivePieces appears to have several advantages over Structr, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

ActivePieces wins

Community & Popularity

ActivePieces significantly outpaces Structr in community adoption with 25,246 stars compared to 828 stars on GitHub. This 30.5x difference suggests ActivePieces has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, ActivePieces has 4,403 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

ActivePieces wins

Growth Momentum

ActivePieces is growing faster, adding 493 stars in the last 30 days (+2%) against losing 2 stars for Structr (-0.2%). ActivePieces is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with ActivePieces last updated 6 hours ago and Structr 16 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: ActivePieces uses JSX while Structr leverages Java.

Structr wins

Project Maturity

Structr has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to ActivePieces which began 4 years ago. This 12.0-year head start suggests Structr may have more mature features and established processes.

ActivePieces wins

Licensing

ActivePieces is licensed under MIT, while Structr's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: ActivePieces also focuses on API Integration, Workflow Automation.

Comparable