Learn how SeriesGuide and Tonkatsu Box differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these personal tracking apps is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both SeriesGuide and Tonkatsu Box have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SeriesGuide significantly outpaces Tonkatsu Box in community adoption with 2,146 stars compared to 507 stars on GitHub. This 4.2x difference suggests SeriesGuide has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SeriesGuide has 417 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Tonkatsu Box is growing faster, adding 62 stars in the last 30 days (+14%) against adding 14 stars for SeriesGuide (+0.7%). Tonkatsu Box is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with SeriesGuide last updated 5 days ago and Tonkatsu Box 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Kotlin. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SeriesGuide uses Bash, Java while Tonkatsu Box leverages C, Objective-C, Swift, C++, Dart.
SeriesGuide has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Tonkatsu Box which began 7 months ago. This 14.8-year head start suggests SeriesGuide may have more mature features and established processes.
Tonkatsu Box is licensed under MIT, while SeriesGuide's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Personal Tracking Apps.
Tonkatsu Box provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while SeriesGuide may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.