Learn how Reflex and Structr differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Reflex and Structr have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Reflex significantly outpaces Structr in community adoption with 28,898 stars compared to 829 stars on GitHub. This 34.9x difference suggests Reflex has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Reflex has 1,779 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Reflex and Structr are moving at much the same rate, adding 56 stars and adding 1 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.2% vs +0.1%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Reflex last updated 27 minutes ago and Structr 11 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Reflex uses Python while Structr leverages Typescript, Java.
Structr has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Reflex which began 4 years ago. This 11.9-year head start suggests Structr may have more mature features and established processes.
Reflex is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Structr's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Reflex also focuses on Development Environments.
Structr provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Reflex may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.