Learn how Pearcleaner and SquirrelDisk differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these system cleanup & optimization is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 months agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
5.4.3Repository
pearcleaner
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v2.6.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
adileo/squirreldisk
SquirrelDisk appears to have several advantages over Pearcleaner, particularly in growth, activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Pearcleaner significantly outpaces SquirrelDisk in community adoption with 14,977 stars compared to 2,074 stars on GitHub. This 7.2x difference suggests Pearcleaner has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Pearcleaner has 396 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
SquirrelDisk is growing faster, adding 236 stars in the last 30 days (+13%) against adding 231 stars for Pearcleaner (+1.6%). SquirrelDisk is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
SquirrelDisk shows more recent development activity with its last commit 8 days ago, while Pearcleaner was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests SquirrelDisk is being more actively maintained.
Both projects started around the same time, with Pearcleaner beginning 3 years ago and SquirrelDisk 4 years ago.
SquirrelDisk is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Pearcleaner's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in System Cleanup & Optimization.