Learn how Open Paper and SurfSense differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai research assistants is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 days agoRepository age
2 yearsLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
khoj-ai/openpaper
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v2.3.1License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
modsetter/surfsense
Both Open Paper and SurfSense have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
SurfSense significantly outpaces Open Paper in community adoption with 16,879 stars compared to 524 stars on GitHub. This 32.2x difference suggests SurfSense has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, SurfSense has 1,612 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Open Paper is growing faster, adding 20 stars in the last 30 days (+4%) against adding 422 stars for SurfSense (+2.6%). Open Paper is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Open Paper last updated 16 days ago and SurfSense 2 days ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with Open Paper beginning 2 years ago and SurfSense 2 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Open Paper is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while SurfSense uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Research Assistants. However, they also have distinct specializations: SurfSense extends into Personal Knowledge Management (PKM), Enterprise Knowledge Search.
SurfSense provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Open Paper may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.