Learn how Hummingbot and OctoBot differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these trading bots is best for you.
Both Hummingbot and OctoBot have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Hummingbot significantly outpaces OctoBot in community adoption with 19,281 stars compared to 6,281 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Hummingbot has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hummingbot has 4,790 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Hummingbot last updated 12 hours ago and OctoBot 5 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hummingbot uses C, Objective-C, C++, Ruby.
OctoBot has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Hummingbot which began 7 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests OctoBot may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Hummingbot is licensed under Apache-2.0 while OctoBot uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Trading Bots. However, they also have distinct specializations: Hummingbot also focuses on Fintech Infrastructure.
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.