Learn how Humla and Meetily differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these meeting transcription & notetakers is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days

Both Humla and Meetily have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Meetily significantly outpaces Humla in community adoption with 32,717 stars compared to 349 stars on GitHub. This 93.7x difference suggests Meetily has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Meetily has 3,622 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Humla is growing faster, adding 36 stars in the last 30 days (+12%) against adding 911 stars for Meetily (+2.9%). Humla is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Humla last updated 12 hours ago and Meetily 1 day ago.
Meetily has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Humla which began 7 months ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Meetily may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Meeting Transcription & Notetakers.
Both Humla and Meetily offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.