Learn how Humla and Meetily differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these meeting transcription & notetakers is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days

Both Humla and Meetily have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Meetily significantly outpaces Humla in community adoption with 32,171 stars compared to 324 stars on GitHub. This 99.3x difference suggests Meetily has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Meetily has 3,521 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Humla is growing faster, adding 34 stars in the last 30 days (+12%) against adding 1,046 stars for Meetily (+3.4%). Humla is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Humla last updated 2 days ago and Meetily 2 days ago.
Meetily has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Humla which began 6 months ago. This 1.4-year head start suggests Meetily may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Meeting Transcription & Notetakers.
Both Humla and Meetily offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.