What is the main difference between Humla and Minutes?

Humla and Minutes are both meeting transcription & notetakers but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Humla or Minutes?

The choice between Humla and Minutes depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Humla to Minutes?

Migration between Humla and Minutes is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Windshift – The self-hosted platform that replaces Jira.

Learn more

Humla vs Minutes

Learn how Humla and Minutes differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these meeting transcription & notetakers is best for you.

Humla

Records Mac audio without joining calls, then transcribes and summarizes meetings on-device or via your own API key. Free, MIT-licensed, no account required.

Visit Humla Read more

324stars+34(+12%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
6 months
Version
v0.71.0
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
humla

Minutes

Records meetings and voice memos locally using whisper.cpp, writes structured markdown to disk, and exposes 31 MCP tools so any AI agent can query your conversation history.

Visit Minutes Read more

1,571stars+62(+4.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
6 hours ago
Repository age
7 months
Version
v0.30.10
License
MIT
Repository
silverstein/minutes

Detailed Comparison

Both Humla and Minutes have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Minutes wins

Community & Popularity

Minutes significantly outpaces Humla in community adoption with 1,571 stars compared to 324 stars on GitHub. This 4.8x difference suggests Minutes has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Minutes has 179 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Humla wins

Growth Momentum

Humla is growing faster, adding 34 stars in the last 30 days (+12%) against adding 62 stars for Minutes (+4.1%). Humla is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Humla last updated 2 days ago and Minutes 6 hours ago.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Humla beginning 6 months ago and Minutes 7 months ago.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Meeting Transcription & Notetakers.

Humla wins

Hosting & Deployment

Humla provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Minutes may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

Other tool comparisons to consider