Learn how FastGPT and Latitude differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these llm application frameworks is best for you.

Warning: This project hasn't been updated in 2 years and might not be actively maintained anymore.
Auto-fetched .

Both FastGPT and Latitude have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
FastGPT significantly outpaces Latitude in community adoption with 28,073 stars compared to 951 stars on GitHub. This 29.5x difference suggests FastGPT has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, FastGPT has 7,100 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
FastGPT shows more recent development activity with its last commit 21 hours ago, while Latitude was last updated 2 years ago. This suggests FastGPT is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: FastGPT uses Python, Next.js, SCSS, NestJS while Latitude leverages SvelteKit.
Both projects started around the same time, with FastGPT beginning 3 years ago and Latitude 2 years ago.
Latitude is licensed under LGPL-3.0, while FastGPT's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in LLM Application Frameworks.
Latitude provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while FastGPT may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.