Submit
Ad
 
Learn More

Digger vs Terrateam

Learn how Digger and Terrateam differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure as code (iac) tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Digger

Digger

Open-source CI/CD orchestrator for Terraform with pull request automation, drift detection, and enterprise-grade security. Self-hostable with private runners.
Visit DiggerRead more
5,043stars+27(+0.5%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit

    29 days ago

  • Repository age

    4 years

  • Version

    v0.6.149

  • License

    MIT

  • Self-hosted

    Yes

  • Repository

    diggerhq/digger
Screenshot of Digger
Favicon of Terrateam

Terrateam

Automate infrastructure changes with secure GitOps workflows. Plan, validate, and deploy Terraform, OpenTofu, and Pulumi directly from pull requests.
Visit TerrateamRead more
1,281stars+26(+2.1%)

Last 30 days

Screenshot of Terrateam

Detailed Comparison

Digger appears to have several advantages over Terrateam, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Digger wins
Community & Popularity

Digger significantly outpaces Terrateam in community adoption with 5,043 stars compared to 1,281 stars on GitHub. This 3.9x difference suggests Digger has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Digger has 609 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Terrateam wins
Growth Momentum

Terrateam is growing faster, adding 26 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 27 stars for Digger (+0.5%). Terrateam is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Digger last updated 29 days ago and Terrateam 17 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Digger uses Golang while Terrateam leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python, Rust, C.

Digger wins
Project Maturity

Digger has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Terrateam which began 2 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Digger may have more mature features and established processes.

Digger wins
Licensing

Digger uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Terrateam's MPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure as Code (IaC).

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Digger and Terrateam offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.