Digger vs Terrateam
Learn how Digger and Terrateam differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure as code (iac) tools is best for you.
Learn how Digger and Terrateam differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these infrastructure as code (iac) tools is best for you.
Digger
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 days agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.6.155License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
diggerhq/digger
Terrateam
Last 30 days
Detailed Comparison
Digger appears to have several advantages over Terrateam, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Digger appears to have several advantages over Terrateam, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Digger significantly outpaces Terrateam in community adoption with 5,062 stars compared to 1,327 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests Digger has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Digger has 611 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Terrateam is growing faster, adding 35 stars in the last 30 days (+2.7%) against adding 15 stars for Digger (+0.3%). Terrateam is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Digger last updated 9 days ago and Terrateam 2 days ago.
Technology Stack
Digger uses Golang while Terrateam leverages JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, Python, Rust, C.
Project Maturity
Digger has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Terrateam which began 2 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Digger may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Digger uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Terrateam's MPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Infrastructure as Code (IaC).
Hosting & Deployment
Both Digger and Terrateam offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.