Learn how dDocs and Docs differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these collaborative workspaces is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v7.2.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
fileverse-ddoc
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
3 yearsVersion
v6.0.4License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
suitenumerique/docs
Docs appears to have several advantages over dDocs, particularly in popularity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Docs significantly outpaces dDocs in community adoption with 16,978 stars compared to 470 stars on GitHub. This 36.1x difference suggests Docs has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Docs has 700 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
dDocs is growing faster, adding 50 stars in the last 30 days (+12%) against adding 73 stars for Docs (+0.4%). dDocs is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with dDocs last updated 2 days ago and Docs 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: dDocs uses SCSS while Docs leverages Python, Next.js, Django.
Both projects started around the same time, with dDocs beginning 2 years ago and Docs 3 years ago.
Docs uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than dDocs's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Collaborative Workspaces.
Docs provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while dDocs may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.