Cal.com vs Easy!Appointments
Learn how Cal.com and Easy!Appointments differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these appointment scheduling tools is best for you.
Learn how Cal.com and Easy!Appointments differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these appointment scheduling tools is best for you.
Cal.com
Last 30 days
Last commit
4 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v6.2.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
calcom/cal.diy
Easy!Appointments
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 days agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
1.6.0License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
alextselegidis/easyappointments
Detailed Comparison
Both Cal.com and Easy!Appointments have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both Cal.com and Easy!Appointments have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Cal.com significantly outpaces Easy!Appointments in community adoption with 48,626 stars compared to 4,394 stars on GitHub. This 11.1x difference suggests Cal.com has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cal.com has 15,197 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Cal.com and Easy!Appointments are moving at much the same rate, adding 724 stars and adding 59 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+1.5% vs +1.4%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Cal.com last updated 4 days ago and Easy!Appointments 9 days ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cal.com uses CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, NestJS while Easy!Appointments leverages SCSS.
Project Maturity
Easy!Appointments has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Cal.com which began 6 years ago. This 6.4-year head start suggests Easy!Appointments may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Cal.com uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Easy!Appointments's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Appointment Scheduling.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Cal.com and Easy!Appointments offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.