What is the main difference between Cal.com and Easy!Appointments?

Cal.com and Easy!Appointments are both appointment scheduling tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Cal.com or Easy!Appointments?

The choice between Cal.com and Easy!Appointments depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Cal.com to Easy!Appointments?

Migration between Cal.com and Easy!Appointments is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn More

Cal.com vs Easy!Appointments

Learn how Cal.com and Easy!Appointments differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these appointment scheduling tools is best for you.

Cal.com

Cal.diy is the community edition of Cal.com for personal self-hosting, with calendar sync, video conferencing, payment support, and a REST API.

Visit Cal.com Read more

48,981stars+551(+1.1%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
18 days ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v6.2.0
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
calcom/cal.diy

Easy!Appointments

Self-hosted appointment scheduling solution with Google Calendar sync, customizable workflows, and no monthly fees. Perfect for healthcare, salons, and service businesses.

Visit Easy!Appointments Read more

4,433stars+64(+1.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
12 years
Version
1.6.0
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
alextselegidis/easyappointments

Detailed Comparison

Both Cal.com and Easy!Appointments have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Cal.com wins

Community & Popularity

Cal.com significantly outpaces Easy!Appointments in community adoption with 48,981 stars compared to 4,433 stars on GitHub. This 11.0x difference suggests Cal.com has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cal.com has 15,335 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Easy!Appointments wins

Growth Momentum

Easy!Appointments is growing faster, adding 64 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 551 stars for Cal.com (+1.1%). Easy!Appointments is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Cal.com last updated 18 days ago and Easy!Appointments 2 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cal.com uses CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, NestJS while Easy!Appointments leverages SCSS.

Easy!Appointments wins

Project Maturity

Easy!Appointments has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Cal.com which began 6 years ago. This 6.4-year head start suggests Easy!Appointments may have more mature features and established processes.

Cal.com wins

Licensing

Cal.com uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Easy!Appointments's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Appointment Scheduling.

Comparable

Hosting & Deployment

Both Cal.com and Easy!Appointments offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.

Other tool comparisons to consider