Cal.com vs Easy!Appointments
Learn how Cal.com and Easy!Appointments differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these appointment scheduling tools is best for you.
Learn how Cal.com and Easy!Appointments differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these appointment scheduling tools is best for you.
Cal.com
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
v6.2.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
calcom/cal.diy
Easy!Appointments
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
1.6.0License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
alextselegidis/easyappointments
Detailed Comparison
Cal.com appears to have several advantages over Easy!Appointments, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cal.com appears to have several advantages over Easy!Appointments, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Cal.com significantly outpaces Easy!Appointments in community adoption with 48,125 stars compared to 4,353 stars on GitHub. This 11.1x difference suggests Cal.com has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cal.com has 14,998 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Cal.com is growing faster, adding 876 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 55 stars for Easy!Appointments (+1.3%). Cal.com is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Cal.com last updated 2 days ago and Easy!Appointments 8 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cal.com uses CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, NestJS while Easy!Appointments leverages SCSS.
Project Maturity
Easy!Appointments has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Cal.com which began 5 years ago. This 6.4-year head start suggests Easy!Appointments may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Cal.com uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Easy!Appointments's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Appointment Scheduling.
Hosting & Deployment
Both Cal.com and Easy!Appointments offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Docmost – Open-source wiki software with real-time collaboration, diagrams, AI, SSO, RBAC permissions and more.