Learn how Cal.com and Easy!Appointments differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these appointment scheduling tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Cal.com and Easy!Appointments have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Cal.com significantly outpaces Easy!Appointments in community adoption with 41,520 stars compared to 4,156 stars on GitHub. This 10.0x difference suggests Cal.com has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Cal.com has 12,897 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Cal.com last updated 16 hours ago and Easy!Appointments 6 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Cal.com uses CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js, NestJS while Easy!Appointments leverages SCSS.
Easy!Appointments has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Cal.com which began 5 years ago. This 6.4-year head start suggests Easy!Appointments may have more mature features and established processes.
Cal.com uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Easy!Appointments's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Appointment Scheduling.
Both Cal.com and Easy!Appointments offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.