Learn how ArcadeDB and Memgraph differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these graph databases is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
5 yearsVersion
26.10.2License
Apache-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
arcadedata/arcadedb
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.14.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
memgraph/memgraph
Both ArcadeDB and Memgraph have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Memgraph significantly outpaces ArcadeDB in community adoption with 4,628 stars compared to 1,219 stars on GitHub. This 3.8x difference suggests Memgraph has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Memgraph has 290 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
ArcadeDB is growing faster, adding 48 stars in the last 30 days (+4.1%) against adding 47 stars for Memgraph (+1%). ArcadeDB is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with ArcadeDB last updated 11 hours ago and Memgraph 2 days ago.
Both projects started around the same time, with ArcadeDB beginning 5 years ago and Memgraph 6 years ago.
ArcadeDB is licensed under Apache-2.0, while Memgraph's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Graph Databases. However, they also have distinct specializations: Memgraph extends into In-Memory Databases.
Both ArcadeDB and Memgraph offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.