Learn how FalkorDB and Memgraph differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these graph databases is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Both FalkorDB and Memgraph have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with FalkorDB having 5,659 stars and Memgraph having 4,364 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, FalkorDB has 436 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
FalkorDB is growing faster, adding 152 stars in the last 30 days (+2.8%) against adding 85 stars for Memgraph (+2%). FalkorDB is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with FalkorDB last updated 11 hours ago and Memgraph 11 hours ago.
Memgraph has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to FalkorDB which began 3 years ago. This 2.9-year head start suggests Memgraph may have more mature features and established processes.
FalkorDB is licensed under SSPL-1.0, while Memgraph's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Graph Databases. However, they also have distinct specializations: FalkorDB also focuses on Vector Databases while Memgraph extends into In-Memory Databases.
Both FalkorDB and Memgraph offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.