What is the main difference between AgentOS and Rivet?

AgentOS and Rivet are both ai agent platforms but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: AgentOS or Rivet?

The choice between AgentOS and Rivet depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from AgentOS to Rivet?

Migration between AgentOS and Rivet is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

AgentOS vs Rivet

Learn how AgentOS and Rivet differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these ai agent platforms is best for you.

AgentOS

Open-source TypeScript runtime for autonomous AI agents with cognitive memory, multi-agent orchestration, runtime tool generation, and support for 21 LLM providers.

Visit AgentOS Read more

683stars+10(+1.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v0.15.27
License
Apache-2.0
Repository
framersai/agentos

Rivet

Open-source infrastructure for long-lived, in-memory processes called Actors. Combines state and compute with sub-millisecond latency, realtime capabilities, and horizontal scaling.

Visit Rivet Read more

6,371stars+178(+2.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v2.3.30
License
Apache-2.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
rivet-dev/rivet

Detailed Comparison

Rivet appears to have several advantages over AgentOS, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Rivet wins

Community & Popularity

Rivet significantly outpaces AgentOS in community adoption with 6,371 stars compared to 683 stars on GitHub. This 9.3x difference suggests Rivet has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rivet has 284 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Rivet wins

Growth Momentum

Rivet is growing faster, adding 178 stars in the last 30 days (+2.9%) against adding 10 stars for AgentOS (+1.5%). Rivet is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with AgentOS last updated 7 hours ago and Rivet 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Rivet leverages CSS, Bash, JSX, Python, Next.js, Golang, Rust, Lua.

Rivet wins

Project Maturity

Rivet has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to AgentOS which began 1 year ago. This 2.4-year head start suggests Rivet may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the Apache-2.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in AI Agent Platforms. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rivet extends into PaaS & Deployment Tools.

Rivet wins

Hosting & Deployment

Rivet provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while AgentOS may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.