Learn how Silex and Structr differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these low-code/no-code platforms is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Repository

Silex appears to have several advantages over Structr, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Silex significantly outpaces Structr in community adoption with 3,004 stars compared to 828 stars on GitHub. This 3.6x difference suggests Silex has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Silex has 687 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Silex is growing faster, adding 38 stars in the last 30 days (+1.3%) against losing 1 stars for Structr (-0.1%). Silex is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Silex last updated 6 days ago and Structr 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Structr leverages CSS, Typescript, Java.
Structr has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Silex which began 13 years ago. This 2.7-year head start suggests Structr may have more mature features and established processes.
Silex is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Structr's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Low-Code/No-Code. However, they also have distinct specializations: Silex also focuses on Website Builders.
Both Silex and Structr offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.